Complete Course ACC260 Complete Course
Login
now
Register
now

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

Complete Course ACC260 Complete Course

Click Link for The Answer:
ACC 260 WEEK 1 CHECKPOINT ETHICS IN THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION(UOP)

CheckPoint: Ethics in the Accounting Profession
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Due Date: Day 5 [post to the Individual forum]
· Answer questions 13 and 14 on p. 25 of the text.

ACC 260 WEEK 1 DQ 1 AND DQ 2(UOP)


Discussion Question 1
· Due Date: Day 2 [post to the Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: Read the Where Were the Accountants? Ethics Case on pp. 36-37 (Ch. 1) of the text. Answer the question as if you were Sam.
· Respond to your classmates as if you were Norm. How helpful are their responses?

Discussion Question 2
· Due Date: Day 4 [post to the Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: Many methods are used to maintain high ethical standards in the accounting profession, including government regulations, ethics course requirements in schools, and professional societies or associations that maintain codes of ethics. What method do you think accounting professionals find most effective or beneficial? What method do you think would be most effective for ensuring high ethical standards in the accounting profession? Explain your answers.

ACC 260 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT THE ENRON AND WORLDCOM SCANDALS(UOP)


Assignment: The Enron and WorldCom Scandals
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
· Review the accounts of the Enron and WorldCom scandals in Ch. 2 of the text:
o Enron’s Questionable Transactions on pp. 96-107
o WorldCom: The Final Catalyst on pp. 114-118
· Answer the following questions using complete sentences:
o Enron: 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9 on pp. 106-107
o WorldCom: 1, 3, 4, and 5 on p. 118
· Post your answers as an attachment. Clearly label the case and question number for each of your responses.

ACC 260 WEEK 2 CHECKPOINT UNETHICAL PRACTICES OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN(UOP)


CheckPoint: Unethical Practices of Arthur Andersen
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Due Date: Day 4 [Individual forum]
· Read the Arthur Andersen’s Troubles Ethics Case on pp. 107-113 (Ch. 2) of the text.
· Answer questions 1, 3, and 4 on p. 113 in 200 to 300 words. When responding to question 3, focus solely on the Enron case.

ACC 260 WEEK 3 DQ 1 AND DQ 2(UOP)


Discussion Question 1
· Due Date: Day 2 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a major piece of legislation that affects a tremendous number of corporations. Do you think SOX is really necessary? Explain your answer.
Discussion Question 2
· Due Date: Day 4 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: Answer question 4 on p. 95 (Ch. 2) of the text. Explain your choices.

ACC 260 WEEK 4 APPENDIX B PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO ETHICAL DECISION MAKING(UOP)


CheckPoint: Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making
· Resource: Appendix B
· Due Date: Day 3 [Individual forum]
· Complete the matrix in Appendix B.
· Post your completed matrix as an attachment.

ACC 260 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CRITIQUING PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO ETHICAL DECISION MAKING(UOP)


Assignment: Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making
Although there are many different methods by which to determine an appropriate ethical course of action in a situation, not every method is effective in all situations. Not all ethical frameworks are equally useful. Beyond knowing how to use a particular ethical framework, the ability to evaluate a framework for appropriateness is also beneficial.
· Resource: Appendix B
· Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
· Review each of the responses you wrote in Appendix B.
· Write a 900- to 1,350-word paper in which you critique each of the philosophical approaches for each of the scenarios in Appendix B. Evaluate whether or not the course of action you chose for the Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making CheckPoint really is ethical and whether or not the reasoning for that course of action makes sense. Ask yourself the following questions:
o Is the course of action really the most ethical choice?
o If so, are these the best reasons for making this choice? Explain.
o If not, why? What is a better choice?
o What reasons are there for believing this alternative is more ethical?
· Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any references to the textbook or other sources.
· Post your completed paper as an attachment.

ACC 260 WEEK 5 CHECKPOINT APPROACHES TO STAKEHOLDER IMPACT ANALYSIS(UOP)


CheckPoint: Approaches to Stakeholder Impact Analysis
· Resources: Appendix B
· Due Date: Day 5 [Individual forum]
· Describe how you might conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 of Appendix B using each of the stakeholder impact analysis approaches: moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach. Note: You are not required to analyze the impact on each stakeholder.
· Post your description in 200 to 300 words.

ACC 260 WEEK 5 DQ 1 AND DQ 2(UOP)


Discussion Question 1
· Due Date: Day 2 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: Answer question 5 on p. 354 (Ch. 5) of the text. Explain your answer.
Discussion Question 2
· Due Date: Day 4 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: In what circumstances would each approach to stakeholder impact analysis (moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach) be most useful? Generalize about the approaches and describe when each would be most or least useful.

ACC 260 WEEK 7 DQ 1 AND DQ 2(UOP)


Discussion Question 1
· Due Date: Day 2 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: Answer questions 4 and 5 on p. 264 (Ch. 4) of the text. Provide a hypothetical example to illustrate your answer to question 4. Explain your answers thoroughly.

Discussion Question 2
· Due Date: Day 4 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: What role can an accounting professional play in ethical corporate decision making? Should an accounting professional play a role even when if he or she is not the final decision maker? Explain your answer.

 ACC 260 WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT FULLY APPLYING A DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK(UOP)


Assignment: Fully Applying a Decision-Making Framework
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
· Read the Locker Room Talk Ethics Case on p. 284 (Ch. 4) of the text.
· Analyze the case using stakeholder impact analysis and the philosophical approaches to ethical decision making.
· Explain what you think Albert should do in a 700- to 1,050-word paper.
· Organize your paper using the following section outlines. Review the questions for each section to help you analyze the case and frame your paper. (Do not explicitly answer these questions within the body of your paper.)
o Introduction
· What is the ethical dilemma in the case?
· What events led to the dilemma?
· When describing the dilemma, did you mistakenly propose a solution?
o Stakeholders Involved
· Have you identified stakeholders?
· What is their stake in the case?
· Have you described every stakeholder in an objective, unbiased way?
o Course of Action
· Have you clearly stated the course of action Albert should take?
· What reasons support your decision?
· What philosophical approach did you use to reach your decision?
· What are the weaknesses of your argument? Have you addressed counterarguments?
o Stakeholder Impact
· How do you think each stakeholder will be impacted by your decision?
· Are there potential impacts on stakeholders that are difficult to anticipate? Have you identified them?
o Conclusion
· Do you present new evidence or analysis in the conclusion? Would it be more appropriate in another section of the paper?
· Have you summarized the dilemma, your decision, and the potential impact on stakeholders?
· Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any references to the textbook or other sources.
· Post your completed paper as an attachment.
· Note: An important part of your grade on this assignment is demonstrating your ability to think critically: to suspend judgment while gathering evidence and consulting the various stakeholders’ positions, to analyze each position, to consider the impact of different courses of action, and then to make a decision and support it with evidence and logic.

ACC 260 WEEK 8 CHECKPOINT BRIEFLY APPLYING A DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK(UOP)

CheckPoint: Briefly Applying a Decision-Making Framework
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Due Date: Day 4 [Individual forum]
· Answer the three questions following the Management Choice Ethics Case on p. 288 (Ch. 4) of the text.
· Describe what Sue should do and the decision-making approach that supports such action when responding to question 3. The steps summarized in Figure 5.5 on p. 353 (Ch. 5) may help guide your answer to question 3. Justify your decision based on the impact it would have on the stakeholders involved in the situation using terminology and concepts from Ch. 5.
· Post your response in 200 to 300 words.

ACC 260 WEEK 9 CAPSTONE DQ(UOP)


Capstone Discussion Question
· Due Date: Day 3 [Main forum]
· Post your response to the following: Is an accounting professional guaranteed to act ethically just because he or she has completed a course in ethics? Explain your answer. Having nearly reached the end of this course, what do you think you have learned that will help you to act ethically in your future profession?
ACC 260 Complete Course ACC260 Complete Course
Click Link for The Answer:








 
© Copyright 2015 Work Bank Theme by Workbank